Talk:Basic Wiki Content and Editor Policies

From Enlace Hacktivista
Revision as of 20:46, 24 December 2021 by Mx Yzptlk (talk | contribs) (→‎Content)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please use this space to discuss the basic scope and purpose of the wiki

Format

Please add more questions to the appropriate section, and add your thoughts and comments under each question.

For the purposes of this Discussion page only, questions do not need to be signed - only answers and comments.

Questions

General

  • How is the information on the wiki different from the information on Wikipedia?

Editor conduct

  • Do Conflicts Of Interest (COI) prevent users from editing a page?
    • If not, should editors disclose their COI?
      • If so, how to do this without self-doxing?
  • How should the community handle people using the wiki for self-promotion?

Content

  • How are hacks attributed when they aren't claimed at the time, but attribution is later claimed?
  • How are hacks attributed when they aren't claimed at the time, but alleged attribution is later given by a third party?
    • How are hacks attributed when they aren't claimed at the time, but alleged attribution is later given by a third party - and denied by the alleged hacker?
  • If a hack is just a dox, should it be included with the wiki?
  • If attribution isn't widely known or accepted, should it be listed on the wiki?
  • Do defacements count as hacks for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Does malware count as a hack for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Do ransomware hacks count for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Do commercial hacks count for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Do state sponsored hacks count for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Do "script kiddie" hacks count for the purpose of the wiki and the Hacker History section?
  • Do hacks have to meet a notability test, similar to Wikipedia articles?
    • If something that wouldn't otherwise qualify is especially notable, does that make a difference?
  • How should the wiki treat anonymous (lowercase a) research?
  • How should the wiki treat claims, statements and self-identifications from dishonest hackers?
    • At what point does correcting this become doxing and does it matter?
  • If the wiki seeks to capture a sort of oral history of hackers, it'll inevitably capture disputed claims - should it seek to reconcile these, or simply record them and their discordance?
  • How should the wiki handle allegations of hackers cooperating with law enforcement, etc.?
  • How much media should be hosted on the wiki?
  • Should the wiki include things like logs?
  • How much cultural content should go on the wiki? e.g. Hacker zines